Indian Air Force lost half of MiG fighter jets in deadly crashes


The tendency of MiG aircraft to come crashing down – right from the time it became the backbone of the Indian Air Forceover four decades ago – earned the fighter jet epithets such as “flying coffin” and “widow-maker”.

On Wednesday, figures divulged by defence minister A.K. Antony in Parliament reinforced in numerical terms how the ageing Soviet-era fleet had shockingly been on a wing and a prayer for such a long period but still not grounded.

The Rajya Sabha was informed that over the past 40 years, India had lost more than half of its MiG combat fleet of 872 aircraft. The minister disclosed that “482 MiG aircraft accidents took place till April 19, 2012“.

http://flightsafetyindiablog.com/2012/12/31/indian-air-force-lost-half-of-mig-fighter-jets-in-deadly-crashes/

Indian Air Force making world record, crashing 500 planes in 20 years


According to statistical data available from multiple sources the Indian Air Force (IAF) has the dubious distinction of having the highest crash rate in the world. No other Air Force comes close.

http://flightsafetyindiablog.com/2012/12/31/indian-air-force-making-world-record-crashing-500-planes-in-20-years/

MPs complement the Indian Air Force


Expedite IAF crash probes, says Antony

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Expedite-IAF-crash-probes-says-Antony/articleshow/17107736.cms

NEW DELHI: Defence minister A K Antony on Monday asked the Indian Air Force to quickly complete all pending courts of inquiry into recent air crashes so as to better understand reasons behind them. There have been over 60 air crashes in the last five years.

An official said Antony’s instructions came during the meeting of the consultative committee of the defence ministry. “Antony asked the IAF to complete all pending CoI proceedings into air accidents as early as possible and take appropriate remedial measures,” he said.

Vice-chief of air staff Air Marshal D C Kumaria briefed the members of the committee about various steps being taken to improve the safety record of IAF. He told the meeting that 63 category-I air crashes, in which planes were damaged beyond economic repair, had taken place in the last five years. Most of these crashes involved fighters, officials said.

On the safety of IAF’s helicopter fleet, Antony told the meeting that an inspection of all helicopter detachments was carried out after it emerged that a large number of chopper accidents took place when they were away from the parent base. “These inspections resulted in highlighting several shortcomings and action is being taken on a priority basis,” the defence minister was quoted as telling the members.

Antony said a joint committee comprising representatives of defence ministry, IAF, Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd, DRDO and DGAQA has been constituted to monitor implementation of the recommendations of the court of inquiry specially for category-I aircraft accidents.

The minister said another area of focus to improve safety records was the training standards of young fighter aircrew. The basic flying training task was shifted from HPT-32 to Kiran aircraft, and to make up for the deficiencies of training resources, the availability of Kiran aircraft is being enhanced to strengthen the foundation training of pilots, he said. “Procurement of 75 Basic Trainer Aircraft has been fast-tracked and the first training course on the new trainer aircraft ‘Pilatus’ will commence in July 2013,” the ministry said in a statement.

It said MPs cutting across party lines complimented IAF for progressively bringing down category-I accident rates over the past 30 years.

3 Precious Lives from IAF perish with Saras. DRDO/Defence PSUs/Ordnance factories fail to deliver.


Monday, September 17, 2012

Defence PSUs: The Great Betrayal

By Gp Capt AG Bewoor Retd

When the Saras crashed, killing its crew, the deafening silence in the media, as also from those who know about flight testing, design and manufacture of aeroplanes, and the unforeseen dangers in this activity, was rudely apparent. What is the Saras for? Who would use it? What kind of pilots would fly such a piece of aeronautical disingenuity? Was the Saras made to order, or was it created without any Qualitative Requirements? Which potential airline or military user was consulted before the Saras design was frozen? Which certification agency oversaw the progress of Saras from the drawing board to the shop floor, and into the air? These and many more questions are out of public domain, and alas, neither the media, nor the aeronautical engineering community, nor the Office of Scientific Adviser (SA)  to the Raksha Mantri (RM), nor the Parliament, nor the Defence Ministry have demanded answers from the Designers or the Flight Testing agency controlling the Saras programme.
No chief of the IAF will ever buy the Saras. Which VIP will fly in this piece of unreliable aeronautics?
Whither Accountability. What can one say about the accountability of these organisations? Three precious lives of the Indian Air Force perished with the Saras. Why were they doing this job on an aeroplane which would never to be inducted into the IAF? Why was this piece of poor aeronautical engineering thrust upon the IAF?
Why Do the Armed Forces Get Unusable Weapons?
Enough Is Enough. It logically leads us to a very basic question – why did the IAF do this for a lemon of an aircraft? No chief of the IAF will ever buy the Saras. Which VIP will fly in this piece of unreliable aeronautics? Just because the National  Aerospace Laboratories (NAL) can make nothing better, must we accept it and then precipitate an avoidable tragedy? What are the credentials of the NAL to design aeroplanes? Are NAL designers willing to travel in the Saras? Indeed, the IAF must support indigenous industry, and it has done so for decades, many times against better judgment, and what is more, that it has sacrificed in men and efforts to boost indigenous technology. After 26/11 the clamour  was: “enough is enough”.
Is it not time for the Indian Armed Forces to say the same thing about the DRDO, specially after the Saras crash? Arguments and justification for PSUs/DRDO/Ord Factories continuing to design and manufacture what the Armed Forces do not want, will remain. It has to stop somewhere, maybe this accident should galvanize us into affirmative action to resist being burdened with weapons that we do not need today, and we will certainly not need tomorrow.
India’s Security in Jeopardy. Some classic examples of our R&D failures are the Arjun tank, INSAS rifle, Saras, Kaveri, Akaash, Nag, Indra Radar, and so many more unknown to me and India. During Aero India 2009, I was staying at the BSF Mess, and a young constable asked me “Saab, why have we been given the INSAS rifle? It stops more often than it fires”. After pumping crores into Ordnance Factories, they make unreliable rifles for our jawans? The recent revelations about DG Ordnance Factory Board, taking bribes from suppliers, tells us what is happening in that organization. What is worse, no one seems to want to remedy the malaise. We faujis have made so much fuss about the 6th Pay Commission, One Rank One Pension, Warrant of Precedence – fasts at Jantar Mantar, but no protest from any quarter, over all these years, about useless equipment being dumped upon the disciplined faujis? In turn the fauji fights and wins the battle. Is this not willful dereliction of duty by successive DRDO scientists, and their supreme commander, SA to RM? Each of them, without exception is guilty.
Forget the investment poured into DRDO, look at the loss of lives because of their incompetence and negligence. The constant failure of the DRDO has placed India’s security in peril.
Most SAs and their scientists are alive and flourishing. Even today in 2009 is it not shameful that we are importing flak jackets and winter clothing? Should DRDO/PSUs be even tasked to design and manufacture equipment for the Armed Forces? Won’t a small entrepreneur in NOIDA or Erode do a better job? Or better, ask Tirupur – they will replace their traditional hosiery with armored jackets for the Armed Forces, CISF, BSF, and ordinary cops. Whenever the Armed Forces want a weapon system, the DRDO invariably says “we can make it” and they have an unassailable record of never delivering. Ultimately, we import that same equipment at ten times the cost. Stories of this perfidy are too many to enumerate. In the interim, battles take place, and till now over the last 62 years, the fauj has delivered victory to India, except in 1962. DRDO cannot boast of such a record. Why not? Forget the investment poured into DRDO, look at the loss of lives because of their incompetence and negligence. The constant failure of the DRDO has placed India’s security in peril. The purpose of this article is not to list the unerring failures of our DRDO laboratories, Defense PSUs, and Ordnance Factories. It is to seek accountability, disciplinary action from those who have put India in jeopardy, by constant failure to give what is promised to the Indian Armed Forces to fight for India and her people.
Who Gets Punished for Non-Performance & Manpower Shortage?
No Accountability. Fauji officers who under perform or commit blunders get punished, they miss promotions and the majority in any case waste out with as little as 25 years of service. DRDO scientists continue unhindered till 60 years, even when they do not deliver. Which DRDO boffin was punished for the Jaguar that blew up over Pokhran, or for repeated failed missiles? Has anyone from Ordnance Factories been punished for the INSAS rifle? For nearly 35 years of their service, DRDO scientists fail to make what they are paid for. They fail in delivering goods. They fail to even copy a weapon system, and then retire gracefully with full benefits. Can there be a more pitiable state of affairs in the scientific community of India? How much longer will DRDO and its associates gobble up large parts from the Consolidated Fund of India, with zero returns? How much longer must the Armed Forces be held hostage by non-performing technocrats? Will no one address this malady?
Can India continue to accept this treachery? Is there no one who will free us from these incompetent high priests of technology? Can the media not seize this opportunity to reveal the truth and force remedial action? How come that greatest SA to RM could not ‘ignite the minds’ of his non-performing scientists? The basic cause is that motivational fuses were never inserted into DRDO scientists.

9 Air Force personnel killed in midair collision of two MI-17 Helicopters near Jamnagar


JAMNAGAR: The midair collision between twoIndian Air Force (IAF) helicopters near Sarmat village, around 15 km from Jamnagar on Thursday, which claimed the lives of nine IAF personnel, brought back the horrific memories of a 2004 crash in the region. At least four persons, including two children, were killed and 14 others injured when a MiG-21 fighter had crashed at Lakhabaval village in the district eight years ago.

“I was working in my farm when I heard aterrific sound. As our farm is located near the Indian Air Force base in Jamnagar, we are used to hearing such sounds. We always see aircraft and helicopters flying over our farms. But this sound was different. I turned towards the direction from where the sound came and saw two helicopters coming down after the crash. One of the helicopters had caught fire. One crashed in my farm and the other in my uncle’s farm,” farmer Laxman Borsva (25) of Tarmad village said.

Jasabhai Borsva, who saw one helicopter crash in his farm, said, “We first wanted to know whether it had hurt anyone from the village. Fortunately, no one was there at the spot. I thought the burning helicopter will crush me under it. The incident occurred within seconds.”

The 40-year-old farmer said, “Had the copter fallen on a human habitat, the consequences would have been huge. We found four persons in one of the helicopter in a pool of blood. Local people tried to pull out the injured from the helicopter and by an IAF’s team arrived. In the other helicopter, all five people were burnt alive.”

A farmer of Sarmat village Ashabhai Bharwad (46) said, “It was a terrible scene. A couple of the IAF men were still breathing when we reached the spot. The images of this tragedy will forever remain before my eyes.”

[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Six-killed-as-two-IAF-helicopters-collide-midair-in-Gujarat/articleshow/15992274.cms]

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/rajkot/Helicopter-collision-creates-panic-among-villagers/articleshow/16014088.cms

 

Technocrat, not bureaucrat, should head DGCA



By K.R. Wadhwaney

The Indian Administrative Service (IAS) lobby has once again done it. It is not only powerful but clever and visionary also for its officers to retain control on ‘prime and lucrative’ positions in the government.

It first deputes an officer for a year or two to the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) and, then at the appropriate time, installs him as chief of the Directorate-General of Civil Aviation (DGCA).

This ploy, albeit shrewd and successful, has been in operation for sometime. The last full-time incumbent, Naseem Zaidi, for example, became the DGCA via ICAO. Now, as he retires this month, he will be provided another plum position. He, in fact, was to head the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) but that project has been scuttled by influential section in the government.

For years, there has been turbulence in the DGCA. It will continue to happen no matter how competent and dispassionate may be the officer. Flying is as technical, if not more, as medical and engineering sectors. The head of such an organisation must, necessarily, be a ‘techno’ and not a bureaucrat. If the government continues to dither on this vital issue, there will be confusion and chaos in the DGCA, which not only needs an independent officer but one who is well-versed with technicalities.

A deputation in the ICAO for about a year cannot translate a full-time bureaucrat into a ‘technical expert’. The credibility of the institution like DGCA is currently very low and it needs to be improved so that there is some system and discipline in the country’s aviation regulator.

It is fine that the Minister of State for Civil Aviation is bringing about changes both in ministry and the DGCA. According to analysts, this move is being seen as politician’s move to ‘form his own team’. The minister is indeed entitled to have his own team, but members of the chosen unit must be thorough in their knowledge and functioning as safety of passengers is at stake.

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20120731/biz.htm#6

Siachen Copter Crash



Tribune News Service

Leh/Srinagar, May 23
The pilot of a Cheetah helicopter of the Army Aviation was killed while his co-pilot got injured when it crashed today in Siachen glacier – the highest battlefield in the world.

The injured co-pilot has been taken to Chandigarh.

An inquiry has been ordered to probe the reasons responsible for the crash, Defence Spokesperson Lt Col JS Brar said in Srinagar.

He said the Cheetah helicopter, on an air maintenance mission, in Siachen glacier, crashed at about 11.15 am, leading to the death of the pilot and injuries to the co-pilot.

The deceased has been identified as Maj Chandrasekar Singh and the injured as Maj Amit Mohindra.

The crash occurred at 11.15 am near Bhim post of the Army in Siachen glacier.

Army officials said the pilots were trying to get the copter to land on a helipad at the Bhim post when they lost control of the aircraft. It crashed about a quarter-mile short of the helipad, officials added.

However, another report said the pilots were flying the Cheetah chopper to the Siachen base camp after delivering supplies at the Bhim helipad when they lost control on the helicopter.

The helicopter crashed 400 metres away from the helipad soon after take- off. Siachen is located on the India-Pakistan border. Bhim post is about 6,000 metres in altitude.

Preliminary reports attributed the crash to some technical snag. Further details are awaited. The Cheetah and Chetak helicopters have been flying in the Siachen region for over 25 years to provide logistical support to Army troops deployed in high-altitude areas ranging from 10,000 to 23,000 feet.

The Army is said to be looking to replace the choppers with new light utility helicopters in the near future.

The previous Cheetah crash in Siachen had been reported in November 2010 when two Indian Air Force pilots who were on an air maintenance sortie were injured.

Another Cheetah crash was reported in the glacier in April 2007.

Indian Air Force lost half of MiG fighter jets in deadly crashes


 

Gautam Datt.

The tendency of MiG aircraft to come crashing down – right from the time it became the backbone of the Indian Air Force over four decades ago – earned the fighter jet epithets such as “flying coffin” and “widow-maker”.

On Wednesday, figures divulged by defence minister A.K. Antony in Parliament reinforced in numerical terms how the ageing Soviet-era fleet had shockingly been on a wing and a prayer for such a long period but still not grounded.

The Rajya Sabha was informed that over the past 40 years, India had lost more than half of its MiG combat fleet of 872 aircraft. The minister disclosed that “482 MiG aircraft accidents took place till April 19, 2012″.

Antony also revealed that these crashes led to the loss of precious lives of 171 pilots, 39 civilians and eight persons from other services. The minister went on to state that the cause of the accidents were “both human error and technical defects”.

The revelation in Parliament was damning enough to evoke an immediate response from experts. “The Indian Air Force has lost several talented pilots, senior and junior, thanks to the flying coffin that the MiGs are. It is very easy for officers on the ground conducting inquiries to blame pilots and the human element after each crash. But each IAF pilot puts his life at stake from day one,” a retired Wing Commander from Pune said.

Drawing a comparison with Pakistan, which is not exactly in the pink of health financially, another IAF officer said the neighbouring country does not have such a high incidence of young fighter pilots losing their lives as they have been flying more sophisticated fighter jets for years now. “Each time a MiG goes down, people talk of millions and billions of rupees getting lost, but there is no value for a pilot’s life,” the officer observed.

Notwithstanding such overwhelming evidence against its frontline fleet, the IAF was of the view that not much should be read into the numbers because MiGs were the only aircraft flown for most of the time. It also asserted that “serious efforts” had gone into bringing the crash rate considerably down.

Former vice chief of air staff Pranab Kumar Barbora said that while it was a fact that the IAF has lost many MiGs and quite a few pilots, the rate of accidents in the context of the number of flying hours had been reduced substantially. Air Marshal Barbora, who had flown a MiG-21 just before he retired in 2010, maintained that it was a fantastic aircraft even as its high landing speed (around 340 kmph for some variants) made it slightly tricky to handle. He said no aircraft was offered for flying in the IAF without any kind of serviceability.

Air Marshal (retd) T.S. Randhawa, who was the director general of inspection and safety, said the IAF dealt with accidents with utmost seriousness and a concerted all-round effort was being made to ensure that the crash rate came down. “The number of accidents doesn’t tell the real story,” he said.

MiG history

Click here to Enlarge

It, however, indicates the problem of shortage of aircraft. The IAF’s fighter fleet strength currently stands at 34 squadrons. According to the force’s calculations, the number will further dip to 31 in the coming years and it would not reach the desired levels of 42 squadrons before 2027.

This is essentially owing to delays in getting replacements for ageing planes. The parliamentary standing committee took note of these shortages in its recent report, highlighting the fact that the MiG fleet was “overstretched”.

The first MiG was bought by the country in 1966. Since then, the IAF has been flying various variants of the fighter jet. Different versions of the MiG-21 are still in service out of which the T-69/69B (trainer), T-75 (BIS) and (Bison), T-77 (Badal) and T-96 (Trishul) have been flying for more than 40 years.

While the IAF has grounded the MiG-23MF, MiG-23BN and MiG-25, the MiG-27 and 29 have still got more than 25 years of life.

The air force has already begun phasing out MiG-21s in batches and they would be out of service by the end of the decade. The MiG-27s will be phased out next and the MiG-29s are being upgraded. All these aircraft are stationed at frontline bases across the country – from Hashimara in the east to Jodhpur and Jaisalmer in the west.

The MiG-21 is a particularly difficult aircraft to manoeuvre because of its high-speed landing and restricted runway visibility owing to the canopy design. Since it is a single-engine aircraft, bird-hits tend to affect it more. Environmental factors peculiar to Indian conditions, too, impact the aircraft.

“As a senior pilot, I have trained several juniors on the MiGs and we have faced problems. But in keeping with the unwritten code of the armed forces, we could never point out shortcomings in the aircraft,” the retired Wing Commander said.

“It is an established fact that several young IAF pilots lost their lives because they were not willing to eject despite engine flameouts. Nobody ever cares about these factors as the super bosses have their own point to prove – that MiGs are very safe and airworthy,” another officer pointed out sarcastically.

It is difficult to calculate the cost of the entire MiG fleet since various versions of the jet have been bought over a period of 40 years. The latest variant, called Bison, is estimated to be worth Rs20 crore. The IAF has over 100 operational Bisons. Furthermore, the cost of upgrade of the MiG-29s alone will amount be around US $940 million.

http://indianmilitarynews.wordpress.com/2012/05/04/indian-air-force-lost-half-of-mig-fighter-jets-in-deadly-crashes/#more-8903

via Indian Air Force lost half of MiG fighter jets in deadly crashes : North News – India Today.

One pilot dies in a MiG crash every 3 months in the Indian Air Force


171 pilots died in 40 years; 482 planes lost, Antony tells House.

Ajay Banerjee/TNS

New Delhi, May 2
Defence Minister AK Antony today said 171 pilots of the Indian Air Force died in crashes involving the Russian-origin MiG series of fighter planes in the past 41 years.

The Minister said the IAF had purchased 872 MiG aircraft of various types between 1966 and 1980. Out of these, 482 met with accidents between the financial year 1971-72 and April 19 2012, Antony told Parliament in a written reply today.

On an average, one pilot was killed in a MiG crash every three months. Besides the pilots, 39 civilians, eight service personnel and one aircrew member lost their lives in the crashes, Antony said. Causes of accidents were both human error and technical defects.

The shocking statistics come just two days after the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence slammed the Ministry of Defence (MoD). It had said that the fleet of IAF fighter planes was ageing and specifically mentioned the MiGs while asking for an immediate need to induct a fresh lot of planes. “The number of aircraft due for retirement after completion of their technical life far exceeds the rate of replacements,” the panel noted.

In the past decade, the IAF has been inducting the much-superior twin engine Sukhoi-30-MKI. It is now on the verge of getting a new set of 126 warplanes as part of the medium multi-role combat aircraft (MMRCA) deal.

For the IAF, “accident” is a broad term and mishaps are put in five different categories. These vary from accidents on the tarmac to full blown mid-air crashes. The deaths of pilots occurred in mid-air crashes and those of civilians due to falling debris, IAF officials explained to The Tribune.

Though Antony did not mention which of the MiG series aircrafts were involved in the most number of crashes, it is widely accepted in the IAF that maximum accidents involved the single engine MiG-21, first inducted during the early 1960s. The other jets of the series are MiG-23, MiG-25, MiG-27 and MiG-29.

The MiG-21 is often uncharitably referred as the “flying coffin” given its crash statistics and subsequent deaths. Barring the MiG-29 (now based at Adampur near Jalandhar) and the MiG-25 (now phased out), all others MiG series warplanes are single engine, making them more vulnerable.

In the past, the entire MiG-27 fleet was grounded following a couple of accidents in 2010. The MiG-29 is being upgraded with additional avionics among other aspects. The MiG-23 does not fly operationally.

The MiG-29 was the last to join the force in the late 1980s. These aircraft were inducted during the height of the Cold War and had created a flutter in those times.

flying coffin

n The MiG series aircraft was inducted into the IAF in the 1960s, beginning with the MiG-21
n The MiG-21 is often referred to as the “flying coffin” given its crash statistics and subsequent deaths
n Barring the MiG-29 (based at Adampur near Jalandhar) and the MiG-25 (now phased out), all other MiG series planes are single engine and hence, more vulnerable

An Amazing Air Marshal!


It was all warm and cosy in the cockpit. Something happened and the emergency handle had to be pulled. ‘Zuk’ went out the seats as the rocket motors fired and the canopies fragilized. Out in open, the buddies were now facing the bone-wrecking hundred ton strong air blast. In no time the drogue and then the main para were deployed giving a jolt. It was a beautiful view of the earth during the descent. Soon the pilots kissed the Mother Earth. All this, from inside the secure environs of the advanced fighter jet to the open ground happened in a flick of the moment. It was never expected.

Eventually the pilots landed on the white spick and span bed sheets in a cosy room. Both the pilots are highly professional. One is in the late thirties and the other a seasoned Air Marshal in his late fifties.

Visitors were anxious and worried about the health and welfare of their loving Air Warriors. The Air Marshal with his shoulder dislocated was seen saying to his better half, “Oh darling, when will I be back on the Golf Ground. I just want to hit that perfect shot, I had been trying for so many days!” The better half appeared dumbfounded. She was saying, “Such a scary thing has happened and you are thinking of Golf; Come on, have some sense. Thank God, you are back with me!”

But to the Air Marshal, it seemed no more than a vacation in the air; a little brash but never mind! He was just smiling as if nothing had happened.

This speaks of the spirit and enthusiasm and the never-say-die attitude of the Air Marshal. Loving Air Marshal, you are really an Amazing Air Marshal (AAM – not air to air missile) a source of inspiration for one and all. The airforcechat salutes you, Sir.  A song for you and dear Maam’, please!

More reading at:The Air Marshal